<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video is Queen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marciahansen.com/blog/video-is-queen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marciahansen.com/blog/video-is-queen/</link>
	<description>digital content strategy, social media marketing, and seo expertise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 21:57:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben FOster</title>
		<link>http://marciahansen.com/blog/video-is-queen/comment-page-1/#comment-55301</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben FOster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marciahansen.com/blog/?p=936#comment-55301</guid>
		<description>heh, you should trademark that catchphrase &quot;If Content is King, Video is Queen&quot;.  Very well written! 

 I am puzzled by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.benphoster.com/video-content-easier-to-share-than-written-content-a-content-strategy-paradox/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;paradox of video content becoming more free while some written news content is becoming more restricted.&lt;/a&gt;

Through Hulu, NBC, Fox, and now ABC have opened the doors to so much great content that is VERY expensive to produce.  Conversely, the Wall Street Journal, the AP, and others want to lock it down and make people pay.  Seems weird...there are a ton of other free options for WSJ and AP, but very little content that can compete with The Office or Arrested Development. 

Also, I can&#039;t wait until video content is better indexed by the SEO.  Right now, all I can rely on is a catchy description.  This is okay for pop shows, but for stuff like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chrisbrogan.com/rules-of-thumb-video-book-review/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Chris Brogan&#039;s video book review&lt;/a&gt;, I wouldn&#039;t have known about it unless I found it from a surfacer like you.  

Keep up the catch-phrases!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh, you should trademark that catchphrase &#8220;If Content is King, Video is Queen&#8221;.  Very well written! </p>
<p> I am puzzled by the <a href="http://www.benphoster.com/video-content-easier-to-share-than-written-content-a-content-strategy-paradox/" rel="nofollow">paradox of video content becoming more free while some written news content is becoming more restricted.</a></p>
<p>Through Hulu, NBC, Fox, and now ABC have opened the doors to so much great content that is VERY expensive to produce.  Conversely, the Wall Street Journal, the AP, and others want to lock it down and make people pay.  Seems weird&#8230;there are a ton of other free options for WSJ and AP, but very little content that can compete with The Office or Arrested Development. </p>
<p>Also, I can&#8217;t wait until video content is better indexed by the SEO.  Right now, all I can rely on is a catchy description.  This is okay for pop shows, but for stuff like <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/rules-of-thumb-video-book-review/" rel="nofollow"> Chris Brogan&#8217;s video book review</a>, I wouldn&#8217;t have known about it unless I found it from a surfacer like you.  </p>
<p>Keep up the catch-phrases!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The longtail ROI of video is SEO - m2h blogs</title>
		<link>http://marciahansen.com/blog/video-is-queen/comment-page-1/#comment-54903</link>
		<dc:creator>The longtail ROI of video is SEO - m2h blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 23:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marciahansen.com/blog/?p=936#comment-54903</guid>
		<description>[...] my previous post, Video is Queen, I wrote about why video is queen (if content is king) and that video has the potential to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my previous post, Video is Queen, I wrote about why video is queen (if content is king) and that video has the potential to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

