Just some loose ideas here as I think more about the rhetoric of affect:
Burke’s Unending Conversation Metaphor
Burke, Kenneth. The Philosophy of Literary Form. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1941.
This unending conversation is a great metaphor for what happens when we blog. Of course, I’m not the first one to notice this idea.
I read something connected to this idea of an unending conversation on Random Connections. The link is to a post about a speech given by David Weinberger at Harvard. Weinberger said that knowledge is an unending conversation. This idea made me think of two things.
First, our question the other night about what we would call the public sphere today. Let me make another attempt: Oral tradition – Public Sphere – Public as Publishers (joining an unending conversation.) That’s not a cool catchy name yet. I’ll keep working on it. It’s something like a cross between wiki and blogosphere. Hmmm… We blog o sphere: weblogosphere.
Second, I am particularly intrigued by the following:

So what are the implications for teaching? According to Weinberger, the job of a teacher should be to make things more complicated. So how we should treat students? Shove content into heads? Evaluate by testing as individuals? Imply ambiguity is a failure? Insist on being right? We must realize that knowledge is an unending conversation. We should teach contexts of knowledge �C how to Listen, to seek ambiguity, and to love difference.

Some forces are afraid af ambiguity, nuance, and difference. They believe that there is one knowledge, only right and wrong. Disagreement is never-ending, and we shouldn��t even want it to go away. A generation that embraces ambiguity will embrace a truer view of the world.

Amen to that! Hmm… recognizing affective connections could be a key to embracing ambiguity and continuing the unending conversation.